Efficacy and safety of artemether-lumefantrine for the treatment of uncomplicated falciparum malaria in mainland Tanzania, 2019.

BACKGROUND: Artemisinin-based combination therapy (ACT) has been a major contributor to the substantial reductions in global malaria morbidity and mortality over the last decade. In Tanzania, artemether-lumefantrine (AL) was introduced as the first-line treatment for uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria in 2006. The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends regular assessment and monitoring of the efficacy of the first-line treatment, specifically considering that artemisinin resistance has been confirmed in the Greater Mekong sub-region. This study's main aim was to assess the efficacy and safety of AL for treating uncomplicated P. falciparum malaria in Tanzania. METHODS: This was a single-arm prospective antimalarial drug efficacy trial conducted in four of the eight National Malaria Control Programme (NMCP) sentinel sites in 2019. The trial was carried out in outpatient health facilities in Karume-Mwanza region, Ipinda-Mbeya region, Simbo-Tabora region, and Nagaga-Mtwara region. Children aged six months to 10 years with microscopy confirmed uncomplicated P. falciparum malaria who met the inclusion criteria were recruited based on the WHO protocol. The children received AL (a 6-dose regimen of AL twice daily for three days). Clinical and parasitological parameters were monitored during follow-up over 28 days to evaluate drug efficacy. RESULTS: A total of 628 children were screened for uncomplicated malaria, and 349 (55.6%) were enrolled between May and September 2019. Of the enrolled children, 343 (98.3%) completed the 28-day follow-up or attained the treatment outcomes. There were no early treatment failures; recurrent infections during follow-up were common at two sites (Karume 29.5%; Simbo 18.2%). PCR-corrected adequate clinical and parasitological response (ACPR) by survival analysis to AL on day 28 of follow-up varied from 97.7% at Karume to 100% at Ipinda and Nagaga sites. The commonly reported adverse events were cough, skin pallor, and abdominal pain. The drug was well tolerated, and no serious adverse event was reported. CONCLUSION: This study showed that AL had adequate efficacy and safety for the treatment of uncomplicated falciparum malaria in Tanzania in 2019. The high recurrent infections were mainly due to new infections, highlighting the potential role of introducing alternative artemisinin-based combinations that offer improved post-treatment prophylaxis, such as artesunate-amodiaquine (ASAQ).

Efficacy and safety of artemether-lumefantrine for the treatment of uncomplicated falciparum malaria in mainland Tanzania, 2018.

BACKGROUND: The use of artemisinin-based combination therapy (ACT) is recommended by the World Health Organization for the treatment of uncomplicated falciparum malaria. Artemether-lumefantrine (AL) is the most widely adopted first-line ACT for uncomplicated malaria in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA), including mainland Tanzania, where it was introduced in December 2006. The WHO recommends regular assessment to monitor the efficacy of the first-line treatment specifically considering that artemisinin partial resistance was reported in Greater Mekong sub-region and has been confirmed in East Africa (Rwanda and Uganda). The main aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of AL for the treatment of uncomplicated falciparum malaria in mainland Tanzania. METHODS: A single-arm prospective anti-malarial drug efficacy trial was conducted in Kibaha, Mlimba, Mkuzi, and Ujiji (in Pwani, Morogoro, Tanga, and Kigoma regions, respectively) in 2018. The sample size of 88 patients per site was determined based on WHO 2009 standard protocol. Participants were febrile patients (documented axillary temperature ≥ 37.5 °C and/or history of fever during the past 24 h) aged 6 months to 10 years. Patients received a 6-dose AL regimen by weight twice a day for 3 days. Clinical and parasitological parameters were monitored during 28 days of follow-up to evaluate the drug efficacy and safety. RESULTS: A total of 653 children were screened for uncomplicated malaria and 349 (53.7%) were enrolled between April and August 2018. Of the enrolled children, 345 (98.9%) completed the 28 days of follow-up or attained the treatment outcomes. There were no early treatment failures, but recurrent infections were higher in Mkuzi (35.2%) and Ujiji (23%). By Kaplan-Meier analysis of polymerase chain reaction (PCR) uncorrected adequate clinical and parasitological response (ACPR) ranged from 63.4% in Mkuzi to 85.9% in Mlimba, while PCR-corrected ACPR on day 28 varied from 97.6% in Ujiji to 100% in Mlimba. The drug was well tolerated; the commonly reported adverse events were cough, runny nose, and abdominal pain. No serious adverse event was reported. CONCLUSION: This study showed that AL had adequate efficacy and safety for the treatment of uncomplicated falciparum malaria. The high number of recurrent infections were mainly due to new infections, indicating the necessity of utilizing alternative artemisinin-based combinations, such as artesunate amodiaquine, which provide a significantly longer post-treatment prophylactic effect.

Efficacy of a Single Oral Dose of Artesunate plus Sulfalene-Pyrimethamineversus Praziquantel in the Treatment of Schistosoma mansoni in Kenyan Children: An Open-Label, Randomized, Exploratory Trial.

Unlike praziquantel, artemisinin derivatives are effective against juvenile schistosome worms. We assessed the efficacy and safety of a single oral dose of artesunate plus sulfalene-pyrimethamine versus praziquantel in the treatment of Schistosoma mansoni. Seventy-three schoolchildren (aged 9-15 years) with confirmed S. mansoni infection in Rarieda, western Kenya, were randomly assigned to receive either a single oral dose of artesunate plus sulfalene-pyrimethamine (n = 39) or a single dose of praziquantel (n = 34). The cure and egg reduction rates at 4 weeks posttreatment were 69.4% (25/36) versus 80.6% (25/31) (P = 0.297) and 99.1% versus 97.5% (P = 0.607) in the artesunate plus sulfalene-pyrimethamine group versus praziquantel group, respectively. Fourteen children developed adverse events, and there were no serious adverse events. A single oral dose of artesunate plus sulfalene-pyrimethamine has efficacy comparable to that of praziquantel in the treatment of S. mansoni, but these results should be confirmed in larger randomized controlled trials.

Safety and efficacy of pyronaridine-artesunate paediatric granules in the treatment of uncomplicated malaria in children: insights from randomized clinical trials and a real-world study.

BACKGROUND: Children are particularly at risk of malaria. This analysis consolidates the clinical data for pyronaridine-artesunate (PA) paediatric granules in children from three randomized clinical trials and a real-world study (CANTAM). METHODS: An integrated safety analysis of individual patient data from three randomized clinical trials included patients with microscopically-confirmed Plasmodium falciparum, body weight ≥ 5 kg to < 20 kg, who received at least one dose of study drug (paediatric safety population). PA was administered once daily for 3 days; two trials included the comparator artemether-lumefantrine (AL). PCR-adjusted day 28 adequate clinical and parasitological response (ACPR) was evaluated. Real-world PA granules safety and effectiveness was also considered. RESULTS: In the integrated safety analysis, 63.9% (95% CI 60.2, 67.4; 426/667) of patients had adverse events following PA and 62.0% (95% CI 56.9, 66.9; 222/358) with AL. Vomiting was more common with PA (7.8% [95% CI 6.0, 10.1; 52/667]) than AL (3.4% [95% CI 1.9, 5.8; 12/358]), relative risk 2.3 (95% CI 1.3, 4.3; P = 0.004), occurring mainly following the first PA dose (6.7%, 45/667), without affecting re-dosing or adherence. Prolonged QT interval occurred less frequently with PA (3.1% [95% CI 2.1, 4.8; 21/667]) than AL (8.1% [95% CI 5.7, 11.4; 29/358]), relative risk 0.39 (95% CI 0.22, 0.67; P = 0.0007). In CANTAM, adverse events were reported for 17.7% (95% CI 16.3, 19.2; 460/2599) of patients, most commonly vomiting (5.4% [95% CI 4.6, 6.4; 141/2599]), mainly following the first dose, (4.5% [117/2599]), with all patients successfully re-dosed, and pyrexia (5.4% [95% CI 4.6, 6.3; 140/2599]). In the two comparative clinical trials, Day 28 ACPR in the per-protocol population for PA was 97.1% (95% CI 94.6, 98.6; 329/339) and 100% (95% CI 99.3, 100; 514/514) versus 98.8% (95% CI 95.7, 99.9; 165/167) and 98.4% (95% CI 95.5, 99.7; 188/191) for AL, respectively. In CANTAM, PA clinical effectiveness was 98.0% (95% CI 97.3, 98.5; 2273/2320). CONCLUSIONS: Anti-malarial treatment with PA paediatric granules administered once daily for 3 days was well tolerated in children and displayed good clinical efficacy in clinical trials, with effectiveness confirmed in a real-world study. Trial registration Clinicaltrials.gov: SP-C-003-05: identifier NCT00331136; SP-C-007-07: identifier NCT0541385; SP-C-021-15: identifier NCT03201770. Pan African Clinical Trials Registry: SP-C-013-11: identifier PACTR201105000286876.

Artemisinin-naphthoquine plus lower-dose primaquine to treat and prevent recurrence of Plasmodium vivax malaria: an open-label randomized and non-inferiority trial.

BACKGROUND: Plasmodium vivax malaria, with the widest geographic distribution, can cause severe disease and death. Primaquine is the main licensed antimalarial drug that can kill hypnozoites. The dose-dependent acute haemolysis in individuals with glucose-6-phospate dehydrogenase (G6PD) deficiency is the main safety concern when using primaquine. The recommended treatment regimen for P. vivax malaria is chloroquine plus primaquine for 14 days (CQPQ14) in Myanmar. The study aimed to evaluate the therapeutic efficacy, safety and adherence for the regimen of artemisinin-naphthoquine plus primaquine for 3 days (ANPQ3) in patients with P. vivax infections compared to those with CQPQ14. METHODS: The patients in the ANPQ3 group were given fixed-dose artemisinin-naphthoquine (a total 24.5 mg/kg bodyweight) plus a lower total primaquine dose (0.9 mg/kg bodyweight) for 3 days. The patients in the CQPQ14 group were given a total chloroquine dose of 30 mg/kg body weight for 3 days plus a total primaquine dose of 4.2 mg/kg bodyweight for 14 days. All patients were followed up for 365 days. RESULTS: A total of 288 patients completed follow-up, 172 in the ANPQ3 group and 116 in the CQPQ14 group. The first recurrence patients were detected by day 58 in both groups. By day 182, 16 recurrences had been recorded: 12 (7.0%) patients in the ANPQ3 group and 4 (3.4%) in the CQPQ14 group. The difference in recurrence-free patients was 3.5 (-8.6 to 1.5) percentage points between ANPQ3 and CQPQ14 group (P = 0.2946). By day 365, the percentage of recurrence-free patients was not significant between the two groups (P = 0.2257). Mean fever and parasite clearance time of ANPQ3 group were shorter than those in CQPQ14 group (P ≤ 0.001). No severe adverse effect was observed in ANPQ3 group, but five (3.9%) patients had acute haemolysis in CQPQ14 group (P = 0.013). Medication percentage of ANPQ3 group was significantly higher than that of CQPQ14 group (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Both ANPQ3 and CQPQ14 promised clinical cure efficacy, and the radical cure efficacy was similar between the ANPQ3 and CQPQ14 group. ANPQ3 clears fever and parasites faster than CQPQ14. ANPQ3 is safer and shows better patient adherence to the regimen for treatment of P. vivax malaria along the China-Myanmar border. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ChiCTR-INR-17012523. Registered 31 August 2017, https://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.html?proj=21352.

New clinical application prospects of artemisinin and its derivatives: a scoping review.

BACKGROUND: Recent research has suggested that artemisinin and its derivatives may have therapeutic effects on parasites, viruses, tumors, inflammation and skin diseases. This study aimed to review clinical research on artemisinin and its derivatives except anti-malaria and explore possible priority areas for future development. METHODS: Relevant articles in English and Chinese published before 28 October 2021 were reviewed. All articles were retrieved and obtained from databases including WanFang, PubMed/MEDLINE, the Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge International, Embase, OpenGrey, the Grey Literature Report, Grey Horizon, and ClinicalTrials.gov. Studies were selected for final inclusion based on predefined criteria. Information was then extracted and analyzed by region, disease, outcome, and time to identify relevant knowledge gaps. RESULTS: Seventy-seven studies on anti-parasitic (35), anti-tumor (16), anti-inflammatory (12), anti-viral (8), and dermatological treatments (7) focused on the safety and efficacy of artemisinin and its derivatives. The anti-parasitic clinical research developed rapidly, with a large number of trials, rapid clinical progress, and multiple research topics. In contrast, anti-viral research was limited and mainly stayed in phase I clinical trials (37.50%). Most of the studies were conducted in Asia (60%), followed by Africa (27%), Europe (8%), and the Americas (5%). Anti-parasite and anti-inflammatory research were mainly distributed in less developed continents such as Asia and Africa, while cutting-edge research such as anti-tumor has attracted more attention in Europe and the United States. At the safety level, 58 articles mentioned the adverse reactions of artemisinin and its derivatives, with only one study showing a Grade 3 adverse event, while the other studies did not show any related adverse reactions or required discontinuation. Most studies have discovered therapeutic effects of artemisinin or its derivatives on anti-parasitic (27), anti-tumor (9), anti-inflammatory (9) and dermatological treatment (6). However, the efficacy of artemisinin-based combination therapies (ACTs) for parasitic diseases (non-malaria) is still controversial. CONCLUSIONS: Recent clinical studies suggest that artemisinin and its derivatives may be safe and effective candidates for anti-tumor, anti-parasitic, anti-inflammatory and dermatological drugs. More phase II/III clinical trials of artemisinin and its derivatives on antiviral effects are needed.

The compound artemisinin-hydroxychloroquine ameliorates bleomycin-induced pulmonary fibrosis in rats by inhibiting TGF-ß1/Smad2/3 signaling pathway.

Pulmonary fibrosis (PF) is a lethal disease characterized by a progressive decline in lung function. Currently, lung transplantation remains the only available treatment for PF. However, both artemisinin (ART) and hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) possess potential antifibrotic properties. This study aimed to investigate the effects and mechanisms of a compound known as Artemisinin-Hydroxychloroquine (AH) in treating PF, specifically by targeting the TGF-ß1/Smad2/3 pathway. To do this, we utilized an animal model of PF induced by a single tracheal drip of bleomycin (BLM) in Sprague-Dawley (SD) rats. The PF animal models were administered various doses of AH, and the efficacy and safety of AH were evaluated through pulmonary function testing, blood routine tests, serum biochemistry tests, organ index measurements, and pathological examinations. Additionally, Elisa, western blotting, and qPCR techniques were employed to explore the potential molecular mechanisms of AH in treating PF. Our findings reveal that AH effectively and safely alleviate PF by inhibiting BLM-induced specific inflammation, reducing extracellular matrix (ECM) deposition, and interfering with the TGF-ß1/Smad2/3 signaling pathway. Notably, the windfall for this study is that the inhibition of ECM may initiate self-healing in the BLM-induced PF animal model. In conclusion, AH shows promise as a potential therapeutic drug for PF, as it inhibits disease progression through the TGF-ß1/Smad2/3 signaling pathway.

SCHISTOACT: a protocol for an open-label, five-arm, non-inferiority, individually randomized controlled trial of the efficacy and safety of praziquantel plus artemisinin-based combinations in the treatment of Schistosoma mansoni infection.

BACKGROUND: Schistosomiasis control relies on praziquantel for preventive chemotherapy. Alternative drugs are needed for the treatment and control of schistosomiasis. Praziquantel is effective against adult schistosome worms but ineffective against larval stages of the parasite and cannot prevent re-infection or interrupt the transmission of infection. Continued reliance on praziquantel for wide-scale schistosomiasis control will likely accelerate the emergence of drug resistance. Artemisinin derivatives are effective against the juvenile stages but ineffective against adult worms. The SCHISTOACT study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of praziquantel plus one of four artemisinin-based combinations in treating Schistosoma mansoni infection in Kenya. METHODS: The SCHISTOACT study is an open-label, head-to-head, five-arm, proof-of-concept, non-inferiority, individually randomized controlled trial with a follow-up of 12 weeks. A total of 540 primary school-aged children from the Mwea area, Kirinyaga County in central Kenya, diagnosed with S. mansoni infection (by Kato-Katz method) are randomly allocated (1:1:1:1:1) to a single dose of praziquantel plus a 3-day course of artesunate-sulfalene/pyrimethamine, or artesunate-amodiaquine, or artesunate plus mefloquine, or dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine, or praziquantel control arm. The primary endpoints are efficacy (cure rate, assessed by microscopy) and safety (adverse events) of each study arm 6 weeks after treatment. Secondary endpoints include cumulative cure rate, egg reduction rate, and re-infection 12 weeks after treatment. The non-inferiority margin is set at - 10 for the risk difference in cure rates between praziquantel and the combined treatment. DISCUSSION: This study assesses a strategy for repurposing artemisinin-based combination therapies (ACTs) for treating schistosomiasis. It adopts a head-to-head comparison of four different ACTs to test a non-inferiority hypothesis and to strengthen local capacity to conduct clinical trials for interventions against neglected tropical diseases. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Pan-African Clinical Trials Registry PACTR202001919442161 . Retrospectively registered on 6 January 2020.

Efficacy and safety of pyronaridine-artesunate (PYRAMAX) for the treatment of P. falciparum uncomplicated malaria in African pregnant women (PYRAPREG): study protocol for a phase 3, non-inferiority, randomised open-label clinical trial.

INTRODUCTION: Malaria infection during pregnancy increases the risk of low birth weight and infant mortality and should be prevented and treated. Artemisinin-based combination treatments are generally well tolerated, safe and effective; the most used being artemether-lumefantrine (AL) and dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine (DP). Pyronaridine-artesunate (PA) is a new artemisinin-based combination. The main objective of this study is to determine the efficacy and safety of PA versus AL or DP when administered to pregnant women with confirmed Plasmodium falciparum infection in the second or third trimester. The primary hypothesis is the pairwise non-inferiority of PA as compared with either AL or DP. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A phase 3, non-inferiority, randomised, open-label clinical trial to determine the safety and efficacy of AL, DP and PA in pregnant women with malaria in five sub-Saharan, malaria-endemic countries (Burkina Faso, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Mali, Mozambique and the Gambia). A total of 1875 pregnant women will be randomised to one of the treatment arms. Women will be actively monitored until Day 63 post-treatment, at delivery and 4-6 weeks after delivery, and infants' health will be checked on their first birthday. The primary endpoint is the PCR-adjusted rate of adequate clinical and parasitological response at Day 42 in the per-protocol population. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This protocol has been approved by the Ethics Committee for Health Research in Burkina Faso, the National Health Ethics Committee in the Democratic Republic of Congo, the Ethics Committee of the Faculty of Medicine and Odontostomatology/Faculty of Pharmacy in Mali, the Gambia Government/MRCG Joint Ethics Committee and the National Bioethics Committee for Health in Mozambique. Written informed consent will be obtained from each individual prior to her participation in the study. The results will be published in peer-reviewed open access journals and presented at (inter)national conferences and meetings. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: PACTR202011812241529.

Immune-mediated herb-induced liver injury: a potential association with herbal artemisinin use as supported by the updated RUCAM.

Immune-mediated herb-induced liver injury (HILI) is an acute or chronic inflammatory liver disease precipitated by a hepatotoxic agent with a presentation similar to acute autoimmune hepatitis. It is distinguished in clinical course from true autoimmune hepatitis by remission on drug discontinuation and immunosuppressive treatment. We report a potential case of immune-mediated HILI associated with artemisinin use, an herb underlying first-line malarial treatments, in a woman undergoing radiotherapy for right-sided pelvic sarcoma. A probable association in this case is supported by causality assessment using the updated Roussel Uclaf Causality Assessment Method (score of 6). She achieved clinical improvement with a course of oral corticosteroids and remained stable without relapse following discontinuation. Increased awareness of this complication is imperative, as literature to date only documents direct hepatocellular and cholestatic liver injury from artemisinin use, and should augment clinician counsel regarding complementary medicine administration, especially in high-risk individuals like those with cancer.

Efficacy and safety of pyronaridine-artesunate versus artemether-lumefantrine in the treatment of acute uncomplicated malaria in children in South-West Nigeria: an open-labelled randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: In Nigeria, declining responsiveness to artemether-lumefantrine (AL), the artemisinin-based combination therapy (ACT) of choice since 2005, has been reported. Pyronaridine-artesunate (PA) is a newer fixed-dose ACT recently prequalified by the WHO for the treatment of uncomplicated falciparum malaria. However, PA data from the Nigerian pediatric population is scarce. Therefore, the efficacy and safety of PA and AL using the WHO 28-day anti-malarial therapeutic efficacy study protocol in Ibadan, southwest Nigeria, were compared. METHODS: In an open-labelled, randomized, controlled clinical trial, 172 children aged 3-144 months with a history of fever and microscopically confirmed uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria were enrolled in southwest Nigeria. Enrollees were randomly assigned to receive PA or AL at standard dosages according to body weight for 3 days. Venous blood was obtained for hematology, blood chemistry, and liver function tests on days 0, 3, 7, and 28 as part of the safety evaluation. RESULTS: 165 (95.9%) of the enrolled individuals completed the study. About half (52.3%; 90/172) of enrollees were male. Eighty-seven (50.6%) received AL, while 85 (49.4%) received PA. Day 28, adequate clinical and parasitological response for PA was 92.7% [(76/82) 95% CI 83.1, 95.9] and 71.1% [(59/83) 95% CI 60.4, 79.9] for AL (0.001). Fever and parasite clearance were similar in both groups. Two of six and eight of 24 parasite recurrences were observed among PA- and AL-treated children, respectively. PCR-corrected Day-28 cure rates for PA were 97.4% (76/78) and 88.1% (59/67) for AL (= 0.04) in the per-protocol population after new infections were censored. Hematological recovery at day 28 was significantly better among PA-treated patients (34.9% 2.8) compared to those treated with AL (33.1% 3.0) (0.002). Adverse events in both treatment arms were mild and similar to the symptoms of malaria infection. Blood chemistry and liver function tests were mostly within normal limits, with an occasional marginal rise. CONCLUSION: PA and AL were well-tolerated. PA was significantly more efficacious than AL in both the PCR-uncorrected and PCR-corrected per-protocol populations during this study. The results of this study support the inclusion of PA in the anti-malarial treatment guidelines in Nigeria. RETROSPECTIVE TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT05192265.

Tafenoquine co-administered with dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine for the radical cure of Plasmodium vivax malaria (INSPECTOR): a randomised, placebo-controlled, efficacy and safety study.

BACKGROUND: Tafenoquine, co-administered with chloroquine, is approved for the radical cure (prevention of relapse) of Plasmodium vivax malaria. In areas of chloroquine resistance, artemisinin-based combination therapies are used to treat malaria. This study aimed to evaluate tafenoquine plus the artemisinin-based combination therapy dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine for the radical cure of P vivax malaria. METHODS: In this double-blind, double-dummy, parallel group study, glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase-normal Indonesian soldiers with microscopically confirmed P vivax malaria were randomly assigned by means of a computer-generated randomisation schedule (1:1:1) to dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine alone, dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine plus a masked single 300-mg dose of tafenoquine, or dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine plus 14 days of primaquine (15 mg). The primary endpoint was 6-month relapse-free efficacy following tafenoquine plus dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine versus dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine alone in all randomly assigned patients who received at least one dose of masked treatment and had microscopically confirmed P vivax at baseline (microbiological intention-to-treat population). Safety was a secondary outcome and the safety population comprised all patients who received at least one dose of masked medication. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02802501 and is completed. FINDINGS: Between April 8, 2018, and Feb 4, 2019, of 164 patients screened for eligibility, 150 were randomly assigned (50 per treatment group). 6-month Kaplan-Meier relapse-free efficacy (microbiological intention to treat) was 11% (95% CI 4-22) in patients treated with dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine alone versus 21% (11-34) in patients treated with tafenoquine plus dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine (hazard ratio 0·44; 95% CI [0·29-0·69]) and 52% (37-65) in the primaquine plus dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine group. Adverse events over the first 28 days were reported in 27 (54%) of 50 patients treated with dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine alone, 29 (58%) of 50 patients treated with tafenoquine plus dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine, and 22 (44%) of 50 patients treated with primaquine plus dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine. Serious adverse events were reported in one (2%) of 50, two (4%) of 50, and two (4%) of 50 of patients, respectively. INTERPRETATION: Although tafenoquine plus dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine was statistically superior to dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine alone for the radical cure of P vivax malaria, the benefit was not clinically meaningful. This contrasts with previous studies in which tafenoquine plus chloroquine was clinically superior to chloroquine alone for radical cure of P vivax malaria. FUNDING: ExxonMobil, Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Newcrest Mining, UK Government all through Medicines for Malaria Venture; and GSK. TRANSLATION: For the Indonesian translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.

Use of artesunate in the treatment of severe imported malaria in France: review of the effectiveness and real-life safety in two French university hospitals.

BACKGROUND: Intravenous artesunate (AS) is the first-line treatment for patients with severe imported malaria (SIM) worldwide. However, after 10 years of use in France, AS hasn't yet received marketing authorization.The purpose of this study was to assess the real-life effectiveness and safety of AS in the treatment of SIM in two Hospitals in France. METHODS: We performed a bicenter retrospective and observational study. All patients treated with AS for SIM between 2014 and 2018 and 2016-2020 were included. The effectiveness of AS was evaluated by parasite clearance, number of deaths, and the length of hospital stay. The real-life safety was assessed by related adverse events (AE) and monitoring of biological blood parameters during the hospital stay and follow-up period. RESULTS: 110 patients were included during the six-year study period. 71.8% of patients were parasite-negative of their day 3 thick and thin blood smears after AS treatment. No patients discontinued AS due to an AE and no serious AE were declared. Two cases of delayed post-artesunate hemolysis occurred and required blood transfusions. CONCLUSION: This study highlights effectiveness and safety of AS in non-endemic areas. Administrative procedures must be accelerated in order to obtain full registration and facilitate access to AS in France.

[POST-ARTEMISININ DELAYED HEMOLYSIS AFTER TREATMENT OF MALARIA].

INTRODUCTION: Falciparum malaria is highly endemic in sub-Saharan Africa. The disease is caused by the intra-cellular parasite Plasmodium within erythrocytes. The recommended treatment is artemisinin-based combination which is efficient and safe. In some patients, artemisinin can cause hemolysis weeks after treatment, presenting with severe anemia. Most of the published cases were following intravenous treatment. We present a case of a falciparum malaria patient with hemolysis and severe anemia two weeks after oral treatment with artemisinin-based combination therapy.

The effect of co-administration of artemisinin and N-acetyl cysteine on antioxidant status, spermatological parameters and histopathology of testis in adult male mice.

OBJECTIVES: This in vivo study aimed to evaluate the effect of various concentrations of artemisinin (Art) alone or together with N-acetyl cysteine (NAC) on spermatological indices, antioxidant status, and histopathological parameters of testicular tissue in adult male mice. METHODS: Six groups of five healthy male mice (25-30 g) were randomly assigned to different experimental groups. These groups received DMSO and corn oil (0.1%) as an Art solvent (Control), 50 mg kg-1 Art (Art-50), 250 mg kg-1 Art (Art-250), 50 mg kg-1 Art + 150 mg kg-1 NAC (Art-50+NAC-150), 250 mg kg-1 Art + 150 mg kg-1 NAC (Art-250+NAC-150) and 150 mg kg-1 NAC (NAC-150) for a period of 7 days. Testes and epididymis were prepared to evaluate the malondialdehyde (MDA), glutathione (GSH), superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase (CAT), peroxidase (POX), spermatological indices, and histological parameters. RESULTS: We showed that the high dose of Art (Art-250) significantly reduced the sperm count, motility, viability, and the activity of CAT and increased the levels of MDA compared to the control group. Also, the overdose of Art caused adverse changes in testicular tissue. Co-administration of NAC with Art (Art-250+NAC-150) corrected the adverse effects of Art. CONCLUSIONS: The current study reports that a high dose of Art affects, spermatological parameters, antioxidant/stress oxidative status of the male reproductive system, and NAC is capable neutralize all adverse effects caused by Art.

Post-treatment haemolysis is common following oral artemisinin combination therapy of uncomplicated malaria in travellers.

BACKGROUND: Artemisinin-based combination therapy (ACT) for the treatment of malaria is highly effective, well tolerated and safe. Episodes of delayed haemolysis occur in up to 57.9% of patients with severe malaria treated with intravenous artesunate, mainly caused by 'pitting' of infected red blood cells in the spleen and the delayed loss of these once-infected RBCs (oiRBCs). Several reports indicate that post-treatment haemolysis (PTH) also occurs in uncomplicated malaria treated with oral ACT, calling for systematic investigation. METHODS: A prospective observational study to identify the incidence of PTH after oral ACT, defined as increased lactate dehydrogenase activity and low haptoglobin level on Day 14 after treatment. Patients were enrolled at two study centres in Germany and Italy. Study visits took place on Days 1, 3, 7, 14 and 28. Laboratory investigations included extended clinical routine laboratory tests, quantitative PfHRP2, anti-RBC antibodies and oiRBCs. The state of semi-immunity to malaria was assessed from childhood and ongoing exposure to Plasmodium spp. as per patient history. RESULTS: A total of 134 patients with uncomplicated malaria and 3-day ACT treatment were recruited. Thirty-seven (37.4%) of 99 evaluable patients with Pf and none of 9 patients with non-Pf malaria exhibited PTH on d14. Patients with PTH had higher initial parasitaemia, higher oiRBC counts on d3 and a 10-fold decrease in oiRBCs between d7 and d14 compared with patients without PTH. In patients with PTH, loss of haemoglobin was 4-fold greater in non-Africans than in Africans (-1.3 vs -0.3 g/dl). Semi-immune African patients with PTH showed markedly increased erythropoiesis on d14 compared with not semi-immune African and non-African patients with PTH. CONCLUSIONS: PTH is common in patients with uncomplicated malaria and oral ACT. While the observed loss of haemoglobin will often not be clinically relevant, it could aggravate pre-existing anaemia, warranting follow-up examinations in populations at risk.

Safety and therapeutic efficacy of artemether-lumefantrine in the treatment of uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria at Shecha health centre, Arba Minch, Ethiopia.

BACKGROUND: In 2004, Ethiopia adopted artemether-lumefantrine (AL, Coartem®) as first-line treatment for the management of uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria. Continuous monitoring of AL therapeutic efficacy is crucial in Ethiopia, as per the World Health Organization (WHO) recommendation. This study aimed to assess the therapeutic efficacy of AL in the treatment of uncomplicated P. falciparum infection. METHODS: A 28 day onearm, prospective evaluation of the clinical and parasitological response to AL was conducted at Shecha Health Centre, Arba Minch town, Southern Ethiopia. Patients were treated with six-dose regimen of AL over three days and monitored for 28 days with clinical and laboratory assessments. Participant recruitment and outcome classification was done in accordance with the 2009 WHO methods for surveillance of anti-malarial drug efficacy guidelines. RESULTS: A total of 88 study participants were enrolled and 69 of them completed the study with adequate clinical and parasitological response. Two late parasitological failures were observed, of which one was classified as a recrudescence by polymerase chain reaction (PCR). The PCRcorrected cure rate was 98.6% (95% CI 92.3-100). AL demonstrated a rapid parasite and fever clearance with no parasitaemia on day 2 and febrile cases on day 3. Gametocyte clearance was complete by day three. No serious adverse events were reported during the 28 days follow-up. CONCLUSION: The study demonstrated high therapeutic efficacy and good safety profile of AL. This suggests the continuation of AL as the first-line drug for the treatment of uncomplicated P. falciparum malaria in Ethiopia. Periodic therapeutic efficacy studies and monitoring of markers of resistance are recommended for early detection of resistant parasites.

The Impact of Extended Treatment With Artemether-lumefantrine on Antimalarial Exposure and Reinfection Risks in Ugandan Children With Uncomplicated Malaria: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: Artemether-lumefantrine (AL) is the most widely used artemisinin-based combination therapy in Sub-Saharan Africa and is threatened by the emergence of artemisinin resistance. Dosing is suboptimal in young children. We hypothesized that extending AL duration will improve exposure and reduce reinfection risks. METHODS: We conducted a prospective, randomized, open-label pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic study of extended duration AL in children with malaria in high-transmission rural Uganda. Children received 3-day (standard 6-dose) or 5-day (10-dose) AL with sampling for artemether, dihydroartemisinin, and lumefantrine over 42-day clinical follow-up. Primary outcomes were (1) comparative pharmacokinetic parameters between regimens and (2) recurrent parasitemia analyzed as intention-to-treat. RESULTS: A total of 177 children aged 16 months to 16 years were randomized, contributing 227 total episodes. Terminal median lumefantrine concentrations were significantly increased in the 5-day versus 3-day regimen on days 7, 14, and 21 (P < .001). A predefined day 7 lumefantrine threshold of 280 ng/mL was strongly predictive of recurrence risk at 28 and 42 days (P < .001). Kaplan-Meier estimated 28-day (51% vs 40%) and 42-day risk (75% vs 68%) did not significantly differ between 3- and 5-day regimens. No significant toxicity was seen with the extended regimen. CONCLUSIONS: Extending the duration of AL was safe and significantly enhanced overall drug exposure in young children but did not lead to significant reductions in recurrent parasitemia risk in our high-transmission setting. However, day 7 levels were strongly predictive of recurrent parasitemia risk, and those in the lowest weight-band were at higher risk of underdosing with the standard 3-day regimen. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov number NCT03453840.

Post-artesunate Delayed Hemolysis in Patients With Severe Malaria in the United States-April 2019 Through July 2021.

BACKGROUND: Studies have demonstrated the safety and efficacy of intravenous artesunate (IVAS) for treatment of severe malaria in endemic and nonendemic countries. However, post-artesunate delayed hemolysis (PADH) is an increasingly recognized phenomenon after its administration. This study describes the prevalence and outcomes of PADH events among severe malaria cases treated with IVAS in the United States. METHODS: Patients diagnosed with severe malaria and treated with IVAS from April 2019 to July 2021 were included. Demographic, clinical, laboratory, therapeutic, and outcome measures were described using proportions, medians, and interquartile range. Patients reported to experience PADH were compared with those not reported to have PADH, and tests of significance were performed. RESULTS: Of 332 patients included in our analysis, 9 (2.7%) experienced PADH. The majority of infections in both groups were in non-Hispanic Black individuals. Parasite density (11.0% vs 8.0%), admission hemoglobin (11.0 g/dL vs 11.8 g/dL) were similar in the 2 groups. Total bilirubin levels at admission (4.7 mg/dL vs 2.2 mg/dL) and within 8 hours after completion of IVAS (2.6 mg/dL vs 1.2 mg/dL) were notably higher in PADH patients. Cumulative IVAS dose of >9.5 mg/kg and >3 doses of IVAS were risk factors for PADH. The majority (7 of 9) of PADH cases were diagnosed within 2 weeks after initiation of IVAS. Five patients (56%) required blood transfusions, and all recovered without sequelae. CONCLUSIONS: PADH is an uncommon and self-limiting adverse event in many cases; weekly monitoring of hemoglobin and hemolytic markers may identify cases requiring intervention in a timely manner.

Artemisinin-piperaquine versus artemether-lumefantrine for treatment of uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria in Grande Comore island: an open-label, non-randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Malaria significantly rebounded in 2018 in the Comoros; this created an urgent need to conduct clinical trials to investigate the effectiveness of artemisinin and its derivatives. METHODS: An open-label, non-randomised controlled trial of artemisinin-piperaquine (AP) and artemether-lumefantrine (AL) was conducted in Grande Comore island from June 2019 to January 2020. A total of 238 uncomplicated falciparum malaria cases were enrolled and divided 1:1 into two treatments. The primary endpoint was the 42-day adequate clinical and parasitological responses (ACPR). Secondary endpoints were parasitaemia and fever clearance at day 3, gametocytes and tolerability. RESULTS: The 42-day ACPR before and after PCR correction were 91.43% (95% CI 83.93-95.76%) and 98.06% (95% CI 92.48-99.66%) for AP treatment, respectively, and 96.00% (95% CI 88.17-98.14%) and 98.97% (95% CI 93.58-99.95%) for AL treatment, respectively. Complete clearance of the parasitaemia and fever for both groups was detected on day 3. Gametocytes disappeared on day 21 in the AP group and on day 2 in AL group. Specifically, the adverse reactions were mild in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: It was found that AP and AL maintained their high efficacy and tolerance in the Comoros. Nonetheless, asymptomatic malaria infections bring new challenges to malaria control.